Trieste Contemporanea dicembre 2002 n.10/11
 
A report from the forum of the eighth Istanbul Biennial
THE FUTURE OF CURATORIAL MANAGEMENT
by Beral Madra

back to HomePage

back to Index


The international Workshop and Round table in collaboration with the eighth Istanbul Biennial entitled “Art-criticism and Curatorial Practices, East of the EU" was held from 18th to 21st September 2003 at the Borusan Art and Culture Centre, Istanbul and at Istanbul Bilgi University.

It was organised by AICA-International(Paris), the International Manifesta Foundation and the newly founded AICA-Turkey, with the patronage of the European Cultural Foundation in collaboration with Istanbul Bilgi University, the Borusan Culture and Art Centre, the European Cultural Association and the Bir Culture and Art Centre.
This international workshop and round table was not only conceived as a critical and theoretical contribution to the eighth Istanbul Biennial, but it also focused on defining current practices in international networking and co-operation, on available models and tools for co-production, on funding opportunities and curatorial independence.
The Istanbul Biennial, as a modular part of the recently emerging international system of biennials and the cultural infrastructure of the region to the “East of the EU”, is mostly seen as a space for experience and training for young professionals who are engaged with curatorial practice, art criticism, and cultural journalism. Whether it fulfils this function or not, has been discussed during the sessions.
Although the participants came from different cultural scenes, the topics, questions and problems raised and debated during the sessions were surprisingly similar. Among the common themes were the institutional background of art production and its effects on the public sphere and of art production and its relations to the official discourses. It was agreed that, in most of the non-EU countries the official institutional background is conservative and incompetent and needs to be reformed by taking know-how from EU countries, which are offering programmes and funds through their institutions. The geographic and contextual diversity of the positions, visions and ethical orientations of the curators and the art-critics was another topic in which the perfectionism that characterizes the international mainstream art with its strong links to the official institutions, the private sector and the art market was accentuated. Curators coming to non-EU countries from these sophisticated environments are misinterpreting and underestimating the local art scenes and they also fail to contact the intellectual groups and individuals. It has also been concluded that the main obstacles on the way to a multi-lateral collaboration are the differences between the infrastructures (education systems, policies and administrative philosophies of official and private institutions) and the markets of the cultural products as well as the absence of theoretical exchange.
To begin with 8th Istanbul Biennale was reviewed in its controversial title, in the statement and the position of the curator, coming from USA in contraposition to the works exhibited. The speakers were united in the fact that the title of the biennial ‘poetic justice’ is a very precarious concept in terms of the current historical moment in the Middle East and the geographical position of Istanbul. The concept opens a debate, but it also reveals the fact that - despite the well wishers and optimists - art fails to change world politics, particularly in these territories. However, the participants agreed that this biennial had gathered a young generation of artists - known and unknown - and had a very efficient organisation. The most appreciated works in the Istanbul Biennale were of Mike Nelson, Fiona Tan, Kutlug Ataman, Bjorn Melhus, Monica Bonvicini, xurban, Tania Bruguera, Fernando Bryce, Filipa Cesar,Ergin Cavusoglu, Danica Dakic, Emily Jacir, Shahram Karimi, Marlene Mc Carty, Doris Salcedo, Song Dong, Monika Sosnowska, Jennifer Stainkampf, Nalini Malani. During and between the forum sessions, the participants from the EU countries were seeking moments and spaces to communicate and to transmit their knowledge and experience, whereas the participants from the non-EU countries were looking for cooperation and collaboration.

The workshop and roundtable were sponsored by ECZACIBAŞI HOLDING, OM PUBLISHING, BEYOGLU MUNICIPALITY

The participants were Farid Abdoulayev (artist/curator, Azerbaijan), Serhan Ada (Istanbul Bilgi University, writer,Turkey), Ali Akay (Mimar Sinan University, Department of Sociology, Turkey), Esra Aliçavusoglu (Marmara University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Turkey), Ahu Antmen (Marmara University, Faculty of Fine Arts Turkey), Susan Barnes Bubig (Director of the british Council, Istanbul, UK), Ramon Tio Bellido (AICA International General secretary,France), Rene Block (Director of Fredericanum, Germany), Jeroen Boomgaard (AICA Netherlands), Pascal Brunet (France), Levent Çalykoglu (Yildiz Technic University, Faculty of Art and Design, Turkey), Christian Chambert (AICA Sweden), Sandra Dagher (Director, Espace D, Lebanon), Mai Abu El Dahab (curator, Egypt), Cem Erciyes (Editor, Radikal,Turkey), Zoran Eric (curator, Serbia-Montenegro), Eva Fotiadi (curator, Macedonia), Hedwig Fijen (Director Manifesta Foundation,Denmark), Hasim Nur Gürel (Director Eczacibasi Virtual Museum, Turkey), Massimiliano Gioni (curator, Italy), Khaled Hafez (artist, writer, Egypt), Henry Meyric Hughes (President, AICA International, UK), Vicky Karaiskou (curator, Greece), Beral Madra (President AICA Turkey, Turkey), Mahir Namur (President European Cultural Association, Turkey), Tea Paichadze (curator, Georgia), Vanessa Reed (Director, European Cultural Foundation, Netherlands), Anda Rottenberg (AICA Poland), Sajid Rizvi, (Editor, UK), Efi Strousa (President, AICA Hellas, GR), Stephen Wright (art critic, writer, Canada/France).

 
 

 

 
 
 
back to HomePage
back to Index